THE opening shots have been fired over the major proposed revamp of the M3 Junction 9.

A variety of Winchester people and groups gave their criticism and suggestions for National Highways' major plans at an open floor hearing at the Wessex Hotel in Winchester on Wednesday, May 17. 

National Highways estimate that the cost of the whole scheme will be in the region of £190million to £210million.

The main issues raised at the hearing were the increased capacity on the surrounding road and cycling networks, environmental impacts and safety.

Denise Rosewell, of Easton Lane, said: “I'm worried about the impact this will have on residents of Easton Lane. The construction compound is to be located close to my property. 

“The plans will impact Sustrans route 23 which runs from Winchester to Easton and beyond. It's very well used by cyclists. It makes it very easy for us to walk to Winnall. The loss of that footpath would have a huge impact. 

“We currently have a beautiful field to look at where we can count the deer, but soon I imagine we will be counting diggers.”

READ MORE: National Highways to hold hearing on upcoming Junction 9 improvement project

Rob Jordan, secretary of Cycle Winchester, said: “The scheme should provide improved cycling infrastructure. We want a satisfactory diversion route. Currently, the plans will cause a reduction in cycling which is the opposite of what we're campaigning for.”

Chris Gillham, from Winchester Friends of the Earth, explained some of the history behind the scheme. He said: “In 1975, the Friends of the Earth were against the first M3 scheme.

“The new junction 9 scheme will cause a capacity increase and environmental impacts. There has been no consideration of proper transport alternatives. I have concerns about the impacts this will have on the local road networks. 

“It's supposed to reduce congestion, but it goes on and on.”

Phil Gagg, from WinACC, said: “We're deeply concerned about the lack of consideration for alternatives. The problem is about reducing congestion at junction 9, but we don't see any appraisal of alternatives.”

Mr Gagg suggested that improving train and bus services could help to reduce congestion.

Cllr Jackie Porter said: “This would increase the traffic at the Cart and Horses junction, which has seen many accidents. Safety improvements could be addressed in the junction 9 plans. 

“With the dreadful accident on the M3, we saw that the local roads can't take the increased volume of traffic.”

At the end of the hearing, Catherine Tracey, representing National Highways, said that written responses would be provided by June 6. 

For further information about the M3 Junction 9 improvement project, visit infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk.