SIR: Hyde Street is neither a rat run nor, primarily, a tourist feature; it is the main thoroughfare of Hyde. John and Dee Hearn (Letters, August 20) should realise that its landmark buildings, such as the remnants of the brewery, only exist because the street offered direct access for vehicles to travel widely with few hold-ups, which is still the most efficient and, importantly now, the least polluting way of doing things.
So why has the council reduced North Walls to one crawling lane of traffic and closed one end of Hyde Street to traffic entirely, sending us all round the houses? It strikes me that if I still worked out of town, with the diversion in place I would already have driven an extra forty miles or so. And, far from reversing those measures, as Southampton is soon to do in Bassett Avenue, there is talk here of making them permanent. Many in Hyde must already be following the half-mile diversion twice a day. Do we want to see these thousands of unnecessary miles driven every year? Please let’s leave trying to solve Winchester’s traffic problems until calmer times, and in the meanwhile follow Southampton’s example.
Neil Hyman,
Monks Road,
Hyde,
Winchester
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel