Readers' letters RSS Feed


letters

Councillors must care about our city


Sir — I was interested in your front-page article on the threat to Winchester’s architectural heritage and on Michael Le Brocq’s comments on the failure of politicians and planners to listen to their electorate.

I was on Winchester City Council when the plans for the Brooks scheme were approved. The council started well: it threw the design open to competition and engaged the public in a consultation process whereby the three short-listed proposals were presented with excellent, detailed models and illustrations.

As we left the exhibition, we were invited to vote for our preferred developer. The result was an overwhelming majority for Scheme A. Scheme C came third. The council voted overwhelmingly for Scheme C. Why? Two reasons: first, Scheme C’s developer offered the best deal in terms of finance and community benefits (although not all its promises were delivered: where is the social housing originally planned?) Secondly, the advice we received from the professionals — architects, planners, “qualified” people — was that Scheme C was “the design for the ’Nineties, creative and exciting”.

Scheme A, on the other hand, was condescendingly called “derivative”. In other words, it looked like it had been done before. There was a comfortable resemblance between its traditional contours, the materials to be used and the Winchester we know and love and which brought many of us to live here in the first place.

Our professionals failed to recognise that almost all the buildings the public love and go miles to visit are derivative and were when built. So “creative and exciting” took precedence over “loved and beautiful”.

We need, more than ever, councillors who care about our city and have the courage to stand up and be counted, not only in defence of what we have, but in insisting that new developments live up to the standards set by those who, over a thousand years, have made Winchester memorable to visit and a delight to live in.

Ron Owen, Cheriton Road, Winchester.


Your Say YourHampshire

rogerslade, winchester says...
12:52pm Thu 2 Jul 09

I have known Ron Owen for many years and agree entirely with what he says. However, he fails to tell us that he was a LibDem councillor, who at that time held the majority and who voted the scheme through. In addition, rather than vote against the scheme, I believe, he abstained. Had the council had the sense to comply with the views of their voters rather than the "experts" we would not be stuck with this ugly white elephant which, again, is nearly half empty. There is a lesson for the future here in that hte views of the electorate should be paramount.

michaellb, Central Winchester says...
1:24pm Thu 2 Jul 09

This is precisely what happened in 2002, the lib dem planners voted for (despite Mark Oaten being vehemently against the development) and the conservatives against; 8-5 I believe. At the time there was a feeling that the lib dem councillors from outer wards were being deliberately unsympathetic towards the representations of 'nimby' conservative councillors in the inner city wards. The party line was that the committee was merely following central government guidance for brown field development, I have never been able to find the clause in that guidance that encourages overdeveloping conservation areas. The outcome was in my opinion an act of democratic and architectural sabotage, with decisions based more on perceptions of individuals, social prejudices and political rivalries than sound judgement or common sense.

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »