Villages RSS Feed


Steve Brine, Martin Tod and Patrick Davies take part in public debate


WINCHESTER’S three would-be MPs were quizzed by countryside campaigners and farmers at a public debate, just months before the general election.

The event at a packed Northbrook Hall in Micheldever on Monday was chaired by the BBC’s deputy political editor, James Landale, who asked the prospective parliamentary candidates if they supported overturning the ban on fox hunting.

The sport of hunting with dogs has been illegal for five years, but it remains a controversial issue.

Conservative Steve Brine said party leader David Cameron had promised a free vote on the subject.

Mr Brine said the Hunting Act was “bad law” and he “would be minded to repeal”.

Liberal Democrat candidate Martin Tod said he was “torn” and more concerned about other animal welfare issues.

He said: “I am a middle way person.” Mr Tod said he was aware foxes were considered “vermin and going to get it — the question is how”.

Meanwhile, Labour’s Patrick Davies said: “Enough time has been spent on this and I think it would be madness to repeal.”

The debate was held at the annual general meeting of the Dever Society, a campaign group set up 20 years ago to fight Eagle Star’s plans to build a new town at Micheldever Station.

All three candidates reaffirmed their opposition to a new town — a plan thrown out by ministers and council planning chiefs.

The trio were also asked by the society’s chairman, Douglas Paterson, for their views on the culling of badgers to prevent TB in cattle.

Mr Paterson, who farms 2,200 acres between Sutton Scotney and Micheldever Station, said the spread of the disease had been “devastating” to farmers and millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money wasted in compensation paid to them after cattle were killed.

Mr Tod said his knowledge was limited on the subject, but he would support the science, to which Mr Paterson replied it was “political science”.

Mr Brine said the Tories would introduce targeted badger culls, while Labour’s Mr Davies said he had no knowledge of the issue.

On planning, both the Tory and Liberal Democrat candidates said their parties opposed “top-down planning” and centrally-imposed targets for the number of new homes to be built. Their parties would return strategic planning powers to local councils.

Mr Davies warned abolishing all national and regional guidance would lead to “appalling chaos”.

He said: “We desperately need more housing in this country, the argument is where to put it.”

Comments(4)

babz says...
1:56pm Tue 9 Mar 10

Ok, here we have three prospective MP's and only one of them has the sense to say the ban is here, live with it and move on. Everyone knows the Conservative party, led by Cameron who is entwined with the Countryside Alliance, can't wait to repeal the ban even though at least 75% of the electorate want the ban to stay, no one really cares what the Liberal Democrats say, and if middle of the road man Mr Tod is an example of their thinking maybe it's just as well. Labour listened to what the majority wanted and put the ban in place and they are not prepared to listen to the whinging pleas for repeal of those who long to get back to killing wild animals with packs of specially trained dogs. So, it's Labour who will be getting my big black bold X.

TP2010 says...
2:07pm Tue 9 Mar 10

The hunting ban must be supported! Mistreating, savaging and killing animals for the entertainment of a minority group has no place in a civilised society. In my opinion Mr Cameron is reaching out to the countryside alliance in a desperate bid for votes. The hunting ban was brought in in a shroud of controversy with the riots that occurred and the breach of security in the debating chamber at the house of commons. So to start stirring up old feelings is rather irresponsible. The ban was passed
and is now the law, as a leader of the opposition he should be concentrating on scrutinizing government policies and not expressing his desire to have
foxes or hares torn apart by dogs!

MHayworth says...
10:29pm Tue 9 Mar 10

I don't expect a sense of deceny from the Tory rep who has been bought and sold by the Countryside Alliance but the Lib Dem view is quite worrying. The Middle Way Group that he mentions was supported entirely by the bloodsports lobby and their 500 veterinarians (which make up less than 2.3% of Vets in this country). The concept of managing fox populations wouldn't be quite so abhorent if the hunts would stop breeding them in order to play the pest control role.

There is no case for repeal. Hunt numbers are up all over the country. Drag hunting is legal. The sense of community, pageantry, heritage, and jobs are all still intact and yet these disgraceful people can’t manage to enjoy themselves unless they are terrifying and killing animals.

M.Hayworth
Campaign For Decency

Mark Lancaster - English Democrat says...
2:37pm Sat 13 Mar 10

What a shame only the 3 larger parties were represented. These parties have contrived to deny the English proper parliamentary representation under devolution so why on earth will they listen to the English people with regard to their countryside? None of these parties can represent the English voter in an English constituency.
http://www.lancaster
edp.com/
Visit my blog to find out why.


Would-be MPs quizzed on the countryside Martin Tod Steve Brine

The panel - photo courtesy of the Dever Society

Would-be MPs quizzed on the countryside

Would-be MPs quizzed on the countryside



Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses