Education RSS Feed


How Southampton 's poor school results can be improved

Teacher and pupil (posed by models) Teacher and pupil (posed by models)

DESPITE slight improvements in the number of Southampton children making the Government’s required grade in science and English compared to last year, the city has slid further down the national rankings.

In 2008, results placed Southampton as the sixth worst performing in England, but this year’s results revealed only two authorities – Hackney and Medway Towns – recorded lower levels of pupils achieving the expected standards.

But what is the reason for the city’s slide down the tables?

Do we blame teachers, lack of spending on facilities, or is it down to social, economic or cultural reasons?

Click below to see a video of today's headlines in sixty seconds

City MP and Cabinet minister John Denham, a former Secretary of State for Skills and Universities, believes one reason is a lack of willingness to accept the extent of the problem.

“There has been an acceptance of poor performance in the city’s education for far too long,” said the Southampton Itchen MP.

“If you go back ten years we were around about the national average in both primary and secondaries.

“While it’s quite true that schools have got better and our performances have improved, they have simply not improved as fast as the national average.

“This needs a clear and single- minded absolute focus on raising standards, working with the schools to see why people are doing better than us with the same sort of children we’ve got.

“Bring all the schools together – primary and secondary – and get everybody to face up to the facts and accept there’s no reason why the school performance should be as bad as it is.

But he believes raising standards isn’t just down to teachers.

“The whole community has got to recognise it’s got a part to play,” he said.

See today's paper for more on this story

See today's Daily Echo for the full investigation into the problems harming education in Southampton.

Comments(11)

Condor Man says...
3:35pm Thu 3 Dec 09

the biggest problem is the huge difference in the ability of young children coming in at reception. Some can read, write and count- others can barely speak. Sure Start should have resolved these issues but these services have been hijacked by the middle-classes looking for cheap child care.

hulla baloo says...
3:55pm Thu 3 Dec 09

Condor Man wrote:
the biggest problem is the huge difference in the ability of young children coming in at reception. Some can read, write and count- others can barely speak. Sure Start should have resolved these issues but these services have been hijacked by the middle-classes looking for cheap child care.
Also, and dare I say it, many children coming from other countries, have limited or no knowledge of English and teachers having to spend more time with them, to the detriment of other pupils.

Condor Man says...
4:07pm Thu 3 Dec 09

hulla baloo wrote:
Condor Man wrote: the biggest problem is the huge difference in the ability of young children coming in at reception. Some can read, write and count- others can barely speak. Sure Start should have resolved these issues but these services have been hijacked by the middle-classes looking for cheap child care.
Also, and dare I say it, many children coming from other countries, have limited or no knowledge of English and teachers having to spend more time with them, to the detriment of other pupils.
you'll find the biggest burden on teachers comes from home grown kids who come in totally unprepared to be educated.

freemantlegirl2 says...
4:57pm Thu 3 Dec 09

Not so long ago, I remember parents being 'told off' by teachers if they had taught their children reading/writing skills before going into school! The trouble is that they keep changing the way we educate children, we cannot seem to grasp the concept in this state education in this country that a child should be seen as an individual and not a 'group' all the time and have just one way of learning. As a parent, I've seen teaching methods change again and again, I'm confused so god knows what some children make of it!

Duncan Disorderly says...
5:04pm Thu 3 Dec 09

So why doesn't the Echo want any comments about losers who rampge through a mortuary with an axe, or crime prevention during Christmas? I only ask because I can't fathom out what PC plonker is running the Echo online site.

stickymcglue says...
5:07pm Thu 3 Dec 09

many teachers effectively "work to rule" , the schools where they dont and all strive for high standards clearly stick out , but too many teachers just will not go the extra mile to get standard to rise... Also , the government clearly needs to exclude children from the statistics whose 1st language is not english for the first three years of their education

driverbelcher says...
7:39pm Thu 3 Dec 09

stickymcglue wrote:
many teachers effectively "work to rule" , the schools where they dont and all strive for high standards clearly stick out , but too many teachers just will not go the extra mile to get standard to rise... Also , the government clearly needs to exclude children from the statistics whose 1st language is not english for the first three years of their education
Many teachers do the job they are paid to do. The "extra mile" you refer to is time that the teachers are not paid for, nor given time in lieu during their teaching day, and scarcely offered thanks for their extra time and efforts.
Why go the extra mile when there is no gain for doing do- would you work overtime without payment just to keep management happy? Because thats what you're expecting teachers to do.
If you would work this extra unpaid overtime than more fool you!

Bassettbadger says...
7:52pm Thu 3 Dec 09

Sadly, even the best schools in Southampton are not up to scratch. I am shocked that the schooling system has been allowed to deteriorate so badly. Every child deserves a good education, but unfortunately Labour don't seem to agree with this. Some might argue a 'bad' education may even be more detrimental! For that reason we have been forced to send our children to independent schools. One of Southampton's outstanding schools had my son in tears on the open day and my son now calls it the naughty school; we were not made to feel welcome at all.

I went to state schools and was hoping to send my children to a good, honest state school, we're not rich but we prioritise our children's education above all else.

Condor Man says...
8:57pm Thu 3 Dec 09

I remember someone telling me about their time as a school governor, alongside a former prominent local politician. That person was so intrenched in a socialist view of education they would not listen to reason- preferring such divisive ideas such as inclusion.

Labour have ruined the schools in Southampton by dumbing down so much. I'm so glad I went to school during the Maggie era. The buildings weren't up to much but at least I learned something.

southy says...
11:32pm Thu 3 Dec 09

this is what you get after 30 years of right wing politic's,, need to go back to before then and start agin and look at where it went wrong, people like condor saw the last of the years of good teaching before the big changes where implemented by thatcher.

Condor Man says...
8:09am Fri 4 Dec 09

southy wrote:
this is what you get after 30 years of right wing politic's,, need to go back to before then and start agin and look at where it went wrong, people like condor saw the last of the years of good teaching before the big changes where implemented by thatcher.
sadly I'm inclined to agree. At Bitterne Park classes were rigidly streamed so everyone was taught at their level. I hear that some city schools like Oaklands taught in mixed ability groups.
Far too much money has been wasted on unnecessary school rebuilds and over purchasing IT.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree