Report this comment
  • "
    Niel wrote:
    southamptonadi wrote:
    C2OPPY wrote:
    Ridiculous fine for the company issuing him with the work they sub contracted to a professional company to carry out the work in good faith that it'd be carried out correctly
    Unable to over see his work and trusting him and then get hit with a 10k fine
    And that's how all the stupid courses come about and all their contractors will now have to write method statements etc explains how they will work.

    They will have to come out and check as we'll now for fear of another fine.

    All the courses will cover their backs as they will be able to turn around and say he's been on the ladder safety course so it's all his own fault.
    Having dealt with life changing injuries due to falls, I'd rather the HSE wasn't being cut back by our caring Gov't. at the behest of big business and those that own and run them who don't even get their hands dirty, let alone put their lives at risk, save for the odd near miss on the golf course...

    Under the control of contractors regulations both the original contractor and the sub contractor are at fault, trust doesn't wash, proper records proving the subby was vetted and intending to be doing it right might have been a defence though.

    You can have all the courses you like, train everybody to the best standards, but there are always those that will take shortcuts, and the associated risks, in the hope of greater profit, or a few hours saved as paid time off.

    As an appointed ladder inspector I regularly take dangerous ladders off people with Doctorates, intelligent, possibly, common sense however isn't measurable! As for contractors who are using ladders that Noah built, often falling apart but held together with insulating tape or old school string, thats another story.
    Do you work weekends Niel? If I was on a dodgy ladder working on a Sunday should I worry that you would turn up unexpectedly?"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Roofer George Nicholls fined for balancing ladder on van roof whilst working in St Mary's Road in Southampton

Roofer George Nicholls fined for balancing ladder on van roof whilst working in St Mary's Road in Southampton

Roofer George Nicholls balancing on the ladder on his van whilst working in Southampton

Roofer George Nicholls balancing on the ladder on his van whilst working in Southampton

First published in Hampshire Business
Last updated
Hampshire Chronicle: Photograph of the Author by , Senior Reporter

A roofer was fined £4,000 for precariously balancing a ladder on top of his van while painting a shop in Southampton.

A passer by spotted George Nicholls working eight metres (26ft) above the ground in St Mary's Road with a labourer providing the footing.

After being tipped off by the public he was photographed risking himself and others when he fully-extended the ladder from the roof of his van.

The Health and Safety Executive investigated and prosecuted Nicholls for safety failings alongside the company that paid him to undertake the work.

The 25-year-old admitted breaching health and safety laws at Southampton magistrates' court after parking his van over a bus stop on a busy road and failing to erect safe scaffolding.

After the hearing Health and Safety Executive Inspector Frank Flannery said: “The photographic evidence speaks for itself in terms of the risks created. Anyone can see the system of work is plain wrong, so why a supposedly competent roofer chose to work in this way is anyone's guess.

“George Nicholls blatantly and recklessly risked harming himself and others, and he did so on behalf of Maintenance 24-7 Ltd, who had clear duties of their own to ensure the work at height was properly planned, managed and executed in a safe manner.

“The standards of both parties fell far below those required, and I would like to thank the concerned member of the public who initially brought the matter to the council's attention.”

Ladders were specified as the chosen method of work, but after the finding the façade was higher than the ladder he had with him, the roofer opted to improvise.

The court was told this system was fraught with risk. Not only could Mr Nicholls or his labourer have fallen, but there was no form of segregation to prevent vehicles or pedestrians from passing under or near the work area. So they could have been struck by falling equipment or materials.

HSE established that the van in question was also parked over a bus stop on a busy road with double yellow lines - indicating a further lack of regard or awareness.

Magistrates heard a pavement licence should have been obtained to create a properly segregated safe-working area, and that scaffolding or a mobile elevated work platform would have provided a safer option for accessing the façade.

George Nicholls, of Hogs Pudding Lane, Newdigate, Surrey, was fined £4,000 and ordered to pay £666 in costs after pleading guilty to breaching health and safety rules.

Maintenance 24-7 Ltd, of King's Lynn, Norfolk, who sub-contracted the work to Nicholls's firm, Laser Roofing London and South East Roofing Limited, in March also admitted safety breaches and were fined £10,000 with £784 costs.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree