Premier League steps up efforts to prevent pubs from screening live games via foreign TV channels

Premier League steps up efforts to prevent pubs from screening live games via foreign TV channels

Premier League steps up efforts to prevent pubs from screening live games via foreign TV channels

First published in Hampshire Business
Last updated

The Premier League is stepping up it attempts to prevent pubs and clubs from screening live matches via foreign TV channels.

The League has been building cases against a number of premises in recent months over what it believes are breaches of copyright.

Around 100 prosecutions are being considered nationwide with the first set to be heard before the end of the month.

It is significantly cheaper for pubs and clubs to pay for foreign channels than it is to subscribe to the Premier League's official UK broadcasters, Sky Sports and BT Sport.

Foreign stations might also show matches not being screened in the UK, most notably those kicking off at 3pm on Saturdays.

In 2012, the European Court of Justice ruled in favour of Portsmouth landlady Karen Murphy, who had been using a Greek TV decoder in her pub.

Yet while the ruling made clear it was not illegal to obtain a TV subscription from anywhere in the EU, the Premier League were backed on issues concerning copyright.

The matches themselves are not protected by copyright, but any surrounding media works such as logos, graphics, pre-recorded highlights or the Premier League anthem are.

Any use of these without the Premier League's permission could therefore be construed as a breach.

Premier League spokesman Dan Johnson said: "We are stepping up our actions in this area and there are a number of reasons for that.

"One was the clarity we got from the Karen Murphy case in terms of copyright protection.

"It was written up as if we lost but in essence we won. It was a pyrrhic victory for Karen Murphy.

"A second reason is that we have just entered into a new contractual period with Sky Sports and BT Sport.

"It is important to protect the investment they are making in Premier League football, which not only benefits Premier League clubs but cascades right down the footballing pyramid to the grassroots."

A private investigations firm, ID Inquiries, has been working on behalf of the Premier League.

Johnson said: "We have committed to a significant number of visits and over the course of a season we will make approaching 5,000.

"We have undertaken nearly 4,000 and out of that we are looking at 100 prosecutions in the pipeline.

"We want to educate and discourage publicans from using these foreign systems.

"We will give the full information and give publicans and licensees the opportunity to cease using the equipment.

"If they choose not to then obviously they run the risk of being prosecuted."

Richard Munden, a barrister at 5RB chambers and an associate of legal advice service myBarrister.co.uk, can see how copyright could be infringed.

Penalties could include a fine, loss of licence or even jail, although much would depend on the individual circumstances.

Munden said: "If you have got a Greek decoder and can get the signal there is nothing illegal about that.

"The question is are you infringing copyright by broadcasting it in public?

"Prima facie yes you are. Not if this only applies to the game, the commentary or the crowd noises etc, but to any of the graphics, the Premier League anthem or any of the things that come up at half-time, that sort of thing."

In theory this could lead to a situation where pubs could attempt to cover up parts of the screen or turn down the volume, as then they would not be doing anything illegal, but that might not be practical.

From a legal perspective it also presents an intriguing situation where this could be considered as finding a loophole to counteract the other loophole the Premier League is relying on in terms of copyright.

Simon Clark, head of intellectual property at Berwin Leighton Paisner, said: "This is a curious loophole since the UK Copyright Act includes an express provision which states that it is not an infringement of copyright in a film or broadcast to show it in public to a non-paying audience.

"Perhaps some pubs will try showing the broadcasts with the sound turned down and covering up the parts of the screen which display the logos and graphics?"

Comments (9)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:43am Fri 24 Jan 14

Ozmosis says...

"It is significantly cheaper for pubs and clubs to pay for foreign channels than it is to subscribe to the Premier League's official UK broadcasters, Sky Sports and BT Sport." That applies to individuals too. The UK football fans are being used as a cash-cow...
"It is significantly cheaper for pubs and clubs to pay for foreign channels than it is to subscribe to the Premier League's official UK broadcasters, Sky Sports and BT Sport." That applies to individuals too. The UK football fans are being used as a cash-cow... Ozmosis
  • Score: 17

12:01pm Fri 24 Jan 14

Roy S says...

The greed of the football league system is just astounding, the UK fans are having to pay for the incredibly high wages of these football heroes. The monies involved needs to be brought back to reality, this applies to all parts of the game, from the ticket prices, to wages and tv charges...if the 'cash cow' of the supportes were to dry up...
The greed of the football league system is just astounding, the UK fans are having to pay for the incredibly high wages of these football heroes. The monies involved needs to be brought back to reality, this applies to all parts of the game, from the ticket prices, to wages and tv charges...if the 'cash cow' of the supportes were to dry up... Roy S
  • Score: 11

12:08pm Fri 24 Jan 14

userds5050 says...

Very interesring. I have seen the Premier league logo obscured in certain pubs that show the 3pm kick offs. It's not always possible to do this though. Ultimatley the PL will get their own way and ban the pubs showing it on the cheap. Is a pity as it's been good to see some of the Saints games you wouldn't normally get to see.
Very interesring. I have seen the Premier league logo obscured in certain pubs that show the 3pm kick offs. It's not always possible to do this though. Ultimatley the PL will get their own way and ban the pubs showing it on the cheap. Is a pity as it's been good to see some of the Saints games you wouldn't normally get to see. userds5050
  • Score: 9

1:51pm Fri 24 Jan 14

Inform Al says...

I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees.
I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees. Inform Al
  • Score: 2

5:40pm Fri 24 Jan 14

dockboy says...

Inform Al wrote:
I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees.
If you personally wouldn’t pay, why are you getting so upset trying to rouse those that would into boycotting football.
If you don’t like it, don’t watch it, that way you won’t get upset at the price, no one’s forcing you to part with your money.

I don't like cricket, and guess what, I don't watch it, so far it's never cost me a penny, but good luck to those that do.
[quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees.[/p][/quote]If you personally wouldn’t pay, why are you getting so upset trying to rouse those that would into boycotting football. If you don’t like it, don’t watch it, that way you won’t get upset at the price, no one’s forcing you to part with your money. I don't like cricket, and guess what, I don't watch it, so far it's never cost me a penny, but good luck to those that do. dockboy
  • Score: 3

6:50pm Fri 24 Jan 14

derek james says...

dockboy wrote:
Inform Al wrote:
I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees.
If you personally wouldn’t pay, why are you getting so upset trying to rouse those that would into boycotting football.
If you don’t like it, don’t watch it, that way you won’t get upset at the price, no one’s forcing you to part with your money.

I don't like cricket, and guess what, I don't watch it, so far it's never cost me a penny, but good luck to those that do.
if you're an eastleigh council tax payer cricket will have cost you some money
(the hotel at the cricket ground), personally i won't touch sky with a barge pole after they charged me £125 cancellation fee
[quote][p][bold]dockboy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees.[/p][/quote]If you personally wouldn’t pay, why are you getting so upset trying to rouse those that would into boycotting football. If you don’t like it, don’t watch it, that way you won’t get upset at the price, no one’s forcing you to part with your money. I don't like cricket, and guess what, I don't watch it, so far it's never cost me a penny, but good luck to those that do.[/p][/quote]if you're an eastleigh council tax payer cricket will have cost you some money (the hotel at the cricket ground), personally i won't touch sky with a barge pole after they charged me £125 cancellation fee derek james
  • Score: 1

11:53pm Fri 24 Jan 14

Inform Al says...

dockboy wrote:
Inform Al wrote:
I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees.
If you personally wouldn’t pay, why are you getting so upset trying to rouse those that would into boycotting football.
If you don’t like it, don’t watch it, that way you won’t get upset at the price, no one’s forcing you to part with your money.

I don't like cricket, and guess what, I don't watch it, so far it's never cost me a penny, but good luck to those that do.
I don't need to be upset to make an observation. As stated I would not waste my money on watching footie, I also believe that those that pay through the nose to watch it are not very clever.. Although I liked playing soccer and cricket in the past, I would not watch either on telly and would probably enjoy watching a game of chess on telly more than cricket.
[quote][p][bold]dockboy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Inform Al[/bold] wrote: I personally wouldn''t pay a penny to watch 22 men kicking a bag of air about, I even wouldn't pay to watch Arsenal ladies. It's time the fans had a boycott to force the money grabbing parasites to charge more reasonable fees.[/p][/quote]If you personally wouldn’t pay, why are you getting so upset trying to rouse those that would into boycotting football. If you don’t like it, don’t watch it, that way you won’t get upset at the price, no one’s forcing you to part with your money. I don't like cricket, and guess what, I don't watch it, so far it's never cost me a penny, but good luck to those that do.[/p][/quote]I don't need to be upset to make an observation. As stated I would not waste my money on watching footie, I also believe that those that pay through the nose to watch it are not very clever.. Although I liked playing soccer and cricket in the past, I would not watch either on telly and would probably enjoy watching a game of chess on telly more than cricket. Inform Al
  • Score: 1

6:49am Sat 25 Jan 14

andoru says...

""It was written up as if we lost but in essence we won. It was a pyrrhic victory for Karen Murphy."

That comes across as if he said it with relish, that the great corporation of Sky was able to crush and effectively defeat this solitary landlady.
""It was written up as if we lost but in essence we won. It was a pyrrhic victory for Karen Murphy." That comes across as if he said it with relish, that the great corporation of Sky was able to crush and effectively defeat this solitary landlady. andoru
  • Score: 2

2:04am Mon 27 Jan 14

Dave Of The South says...

Many fans just watch thru illegal online re-broadcasting sites for free anyway. If PL were not so greedy with money & charged just a very modest fee of off the publicans then everyone would be happy. Punter in pub with pint watching big screen. Landlady/lord with pub full of paying customers. PL with some money. All that'll happen is people will stay at home with booze from supermarket & watch illegal online sport. Now you can get cables to link pc's etc to big screens & so no incentive to go out.
Many fans just watch thru illegal online re-broadcasting sites for free anyway. If PL were not so greedy with money & charged just a very modest fee of off the publicans then everyone would be happy. Punter in pub with pint watching big screen. Landlady/lord with pub full of paying customers. PL with some money. All that'll happen is people will stay at home with booze from supermarket & watch illegal online sport. Now you can get cables to link pc's etc to big screens & so no incentive to go out. Dave Of The South
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree